One of the landmark cases that shaped the legal landscape in this area is Corpus vs. Sto. Tomas (G.R. No. 186571, 11 August 2010), where the Philippine Supreme Court addressed the question of whether a foreign ex-husband can file for the recognition of a foreign divorce in the Philippines.

The Case in Context

The case centered around a former Filipino citizen, the Petitioner, who acquired Canadian citizenship through naturalization. He married a Filipino national, the Respondent, but their union was short-lived as he left for Canada shortly after the wedding due to professional commitments. Upon his return to the Philippines, he discovered his wife's infidelity, which prompted him to seek a divorce in Canada, which the court granted a month later.

Two years after the divorce, the Petitioner found a new romantic partner, also a Filipina. In an attempt to formalize his marital status, he registered the Canadian divorce decree at the Pasig City Civil Registry Office. However, the National Statistics Office (NSO) informed him that Philippine law still considered his marriage valid, and a competent Philippine court must judicially recognize the foreign divorce decree for it to be enforceable, as stipulated in NSO Circular No. 4, series of 1982.

The Petition and the Lower Court's Ruling

Consequently, the Petitioner filed a petition for judicial recognition of the foreign divorce and/or declaration of marriage dissolution. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) denied his petition, concluding that he lacked legal standing to institute such an action, as he was a naturalized Canadian citizen. Citing the second paragraph of Article 26 of the Family Code, the RTC ruled that only the Filipino spouse could avail of the remedy.

The Supreme Court's Landmark Decision

On direct appeal, the Philippine Supreme Court reversed the RTC's decision and held that "direct involvement or being the subject of the foreign judgment is sufficient to clothe a party with the requisite interest to institute an action before our courts for the recognition of the foreign judgment."

The decision underscored the principle that the foreign divorce decree itself serves as presumptive evidence of right in favor of the alien spouse, provided that its authenticity and conformity with the alien's national law are duly proven according to the Philippine rules of evidence. The Court's ruling effectively recognized that the foreign spouses, regardless of their citizenship, have also a legal recourse to seek judicial recognition of foreign divorce decrees in the Philippines, particularly in cases where the Filipino spouses fails or refuses to initiate the recognition process.

The Rationale behind the Decision

The Supreme Court grounded its decision in the principles of due process, equity, and the protection of individual rights. By recognizing the foreign divorce decree, the Court aimed to uphold the rights of the Petitioner, who lawfully obtained the divorce in accordance with the laws of his adopted country, Canada.

Furthermore, the Court emphasized the importance of comity, a legal principle that encourages the recognition of foreign judgments and laws, provided they do not contravene domestic public policy. This principle facilitates the harmonious coexistence of different legal systems and promotes respect for the sovereignty of nations.